Fadi:الله يرحمها و يجعل مثواها بعليين و يجمعك معها بالجنة بعد عم%
بلوجر بالعربي:looks very good
بلوجر بالعربي:مفيد جداً
Noura:Different home, but same longing and nostalgia .. it seems we are chasing a mirage , Beirut of my dreams does not exist nor the people i miss .. i don't know if my gains were worth the losses ? I
price waves repeat:The other day, while I was at work, my sister stole my iphone and tested to see if it can survive a 25 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is now broken
Sara:You can say that again!God Bless🕊
ياسمين حميد:كما هي طبيعتنا نحن العرب، عند الانتقال بين منصة وأخرى لا نحت%
Sara:No, never meaningless.. amen ya Raby🙏God Bless🕊
Qwaider:These possessions are meaningless as you said, but it's still painful to let go :( May Allah grant you all you wish for and unite you with your loved ones
Sara:Wallah bro we literally own nothing, not even our own flesh & blood.. I always wished to have a corner, a special wall, and never did. Moved more than you can imagine, and currently not having my own
This webslice will refreshes every10 minutes.
Memories....
Based on this somewhat (to me at least) conservative view, getting to know someone over the internet (through blogg, chat, forum, social-network, etc...) may be the only acceptable alternative to meeting people that weren't chosen for you by Mom, sister, relative, etc...
Maybe it is decent because morality and religious law haven't caught up yet, maybe its because there is no physical presence, just two people and their thoughts. I don't know.
Another aspect is that you could come to like the person even before knowing what they look like. I've had instances where I would meet a woman, and not consider her particularily attractive. Then I would get to know her, and my perspective changes. I think relationships that start online would tend to encourage this aspect more.
So now that you've written all about why Bloggerettes are more likely to get married, how about the companion post about why male bloggers are not ?
Just kidding, I guess all of them in general are the reason, except for the second and the sixth one ^^
I quite agree with you, through blogging you can find and understand a lot of things about a person that you might not get through any other way of communication.
To me it seems that many bloggers (male and female) have made a clear boundary between their online life and their real life and thus a relationship with someone they know through blogging isn’t something they would ever consider. Many view blogging as a virtual place to vent and organize your thoughts; it’s not for expanding your social network. I personally haven’t taken a stance on the issue, I haven’t been a blogger long enough to decide. So about your points,
1. Good point
2. Hmm I never thought of the alpha male as the blogging type
3. I wouldn’t know about that one but it sounds poetic
4. This one ties with #1, but in this case the comfort you get has to do with the distance so I don’t know how that would promote relationships
5. I’m not so sure I agree
6. Honestly this one sounds cheesy and kind of embarrassing
7. It’s not an arranged marriage when you’re set up by people, family, and friends, to meet with someone as a potential future mate who they think is compatible with you, and it’s not stupid
8.Whatever you say, you’ve been around this way longer than me
Well I’ll be honest, I am actually on the market but I have incredibly high standards and I don’t care if it means I’ll be in my 30s before I get married (hopefully not, I’m 23 now), I’m a hopeless romantic yet conservative, I do come with baggage (I just don’t know what to do with it), and I have a father that seems to hate the younger male gender and thus that will pose a serious challenge.
Men are driven most of the time by their hormones, it's OK most of the time to love someone they didn't even see. I'm not sure it's the same with women, especially these days where the physical view is a very important aspect of the whole experience
By the way, in my previous post, I said it's equally unacceptable, but I didn't say that I wouldn't consider someone who had previous experiences. In fact, after my article ("second hand lovers") I should have added that my tolerance level has grown even more to include people with previous marriage experience
The idea I am trying to show here is that it "could" be one of these, it could be something else. These are not a set of rules, but rather a set of possibilities
I think all single people are on the market, we all have our standards, we all have our personalities and when we blog we maintain our "residual self image" which is what we think we are.
What I meant by an arranged marriage the traditional marriage well known to all
Anyway, thank you all for your AWESOME feedback and great update. That's exactly what makes blogging great. The exchange of ideas. The respect that someone commenting gives to the post, by commenting relatively and generously. So thank you all.
Peace
but if what you say is right I would say that blogerettes got used to sharing their feelings and expressing themselves online, thus might be more prone to expressing themselves in general.
Believe it or not, my fiance and I met online. If it wasn't for the internet I don't think we would have ever met because we both live totally different lives.
However, I'm confused Q, I remember you telling me that you don't like marriages that happen through meeting on the internet and now you're with the idea. Please explain :)
But people do change their mind. Right? So I might decide that I don't like it one day, then something happens and now I suddenly discover that I actually do like it :)
if I imagine myself married to women who bloge and my friends or other talk about my women’s dress or her favourite programs or our dinners or her color hair through her blogs, that will be un acceptable and lead to divorce or something else .
I understand we come from different backgrounds, but how do you define privacy if every things are on the net.
I hope the net cost will be expanisve and people in jordan can not get it .
points that would be shattered would proabably include the one where male bloggers are introverts. and issues like being different online from what you are off line. like i said, you should probably meet me in person to know what i'm talking about.
I think many of the male bloggers are introverts, they seek it as refuge from the hardships of life.
I on the other hand are not like that, I'm even worse in real life :) I'm the expressive type, and don't feel shy to do just about anything in public. People who know me in person, can probably attest to that. In fact, these very traits caused me some heartache when I met the Jordanian bloggers face to face. Which were mostly quiet and shy, while I was jumping all over the place :D
Now, when are we going to hear the good news about you?
Thankssfor your racist comment.There is no need to go down taling about my root.at least i know...... not like other.
Believe me 95% of people in jordan agree with me.you might live in jordan but i think you are from different planet and reprsent miniortoy in community.
Being the majority doesn't mean you're right. And apart from "Tafili" being an insult, I agree with Anonymous that what you said wasn't appropriate. Considering some lady unfit for your taste just becuse she writes, is simply unfair. [Just look at all the benifits
Chika
Many people will continue to think like that, but the fact is. If someone doesn't appreciate your skills for what they are, they're probably not a good fit. And even if what Tafili said was true, and 95% of the people are that, then your match is in that remaining open-minded 5%.
my mind is my treasure, the thoughts i share are to be considered as such. something of value to me. therefor, i don't just give them to everyone and anyone.
as for tafili's idea about writing women, i think he's entirely entitled to chose a none writer or even an illiterate woman to be his wife. there are advantages to both types regardless of whether or not we want to see them or not. someone wants a trophy wife, good for him! inshallah tikhrib beit fawateero o umooro il ijtima3iyyeh! howwe o 7azzo! choices are to be made everywhere, and it's important that we let people make them without passing judgment.
As for the good new, I heard through the grapevine that it's someone who's really nice, quiet, but very nice. And if that is the case, I can't be more happy for you since you have made a wise choice on so many levels
And allow me to be the first to say, Alf mabrook.
Now comes the dilemma,
WHO is going to take pictures at your engagement and wedding parties?! ;)
as for the photos, i don't think it's going to be a problem :D many have battled for the position so i'll be having a good selection of choices :)